Apple Macbook Air 13.3 Review

Macbook Air 13.3 Review

Please note that the Air we tested had a Core i7 CPU and 256GB SSD upgrade for a total of $1,349, £1,234 or AU$2,039. Air still starts at $999, £949 and AU$1,499 and can be found online for even less. MacBook Air 13 2017 Laptop Apple (1.8 GHz) Rating

This may be difficult to believe but Apple's MacBook Air 13 (Unibody Aluminium Construction, 1. 35 kg/~3 lb, 17 mm/~0. 7 in, 13. You can find the initial review here. Apple's oldest background computer system was upgraded in a few simple steps. Thus all hopes for a higher definition screen are gone.

It' s almost as if Apple is making the last arrangements for the MacBook Air failure, rather than improving it from the ground up. Nevertheless, the Air is the cheapest way into Apple's world. The MacBook Air with its 13th edition is only $999. Unfortunately, this doesn't come with an IPS screen at a reasonable cost and even Apple's Force Touch is missing.

So it makes perfect business sense that Apple has not made a general statement that can only be described as continuing lifetime service for its Air Line-up. Praise to Apple for maintaining the Air for another year to meet the still unexpectedly high level of consumer interest and above all for continuing to sell it at a high margin.

Persuading consumers to buy this particular laptop in 2017 is a performance that only Apple is up to. For our test, we have selected the introductory 999 US dollar pricing scheme. Therefore, we won't cover the case, connectors, and inputs in this test and would like to take you to our MacBook Air 13 2015 test instead.

With our new meters, we took another look at the screen, and whether the increase in power also led to changes in emission and running time... Charging... MacBook Pro 13 is now smaller and thinner than MacBook Air 13, and its overall body mass is almost the same.

Several Windows laptops in this priced category are also able to outperform the MacBook Air 13 in terms of height and width. MacBook Pro 13 has become smaller and slimmer than MacBook Air 13 and its overall lightweight is almost the same.

Several Windows laptops in this priced category are also able to outperform the MacBook Air 13 in terms of height and width. Because we didn't test any built-in memory cards in the last review of MacBook Air 13, we did it this year. Wi-Fi is also new and didn't pass our last test of MacBook Air 13 in 2015.

With 686 and 692 MB/s, respectively, the MacBook Air 13 has proven itself excellently in this test. MacBook 12, the more expansive MacBook 12, did not do better, only the much more expansive new MacBook Pro 13 was able to clearly surpass the Air 13. The Air 13 and the new MacBook Pro 15 were as convincing with several thick cement panels between the laptop and Wi-Fi router as the new MacBook Pro 15, with the MacBook 12 dropping behind and the MacBook Pro 13 again surpassing the competition.

Apple is apparently still upgrading its Air with the well known 13th generation. The 1440x900 pixels at this scale correspond to a 128 PPI dot gain, which is relatively low not only when comparing Apple's own retina display, such as the 227 PPI 13-inch MacBook Pro, but also the 1920x1080 FHD panel, which has become increasingly important in recent years.

Comparing the MacBook 12 with its 12-inch 2304x1440 (226 PPI) screen makes it clear how obsolete and horrible the Air screen really is and how sharp and clear a 2017 is. It is most evident when looking at texts where the poor definition of the air leads to blurred shades at the margins.

Therefore, we strongly suggest a high-resolution screen for those of you who work with and view text throughout the workday. Because our new coincidental light readings don't differ much from our earlier ones, the following detail was taken directly from the MacBook Air 13 2015 test.

TN was still widely used when MacBook Air was first launched. The Air's screen doesn't really distinguish itself from the much more advanced IPS screen of the MacBook 12. Our new devices also allowed us to recognize PWM flickers at low screen lightness at very high 58kHz and therefore should be harmless.

Reaction time of the indicator shows how quickly the monitor can switch from one colour to the next. Backlighting of the indicator flashes at 58000hz ( probably with PWM). Fifty-three percent of all units under test do not use PWM to dimm the indicator. Today, Air laptops in the Air budget class are usually fitted with IPS panel.

In combination with the strongly reflecting surface, the bad viewpoints make it very hard to find an optimal screen location and viewpoint. Allow us to address the one point where the new Air 13 has actually got better than its predecessor. And Apple still uses lower-end lower-end processors and keeps its Air equipped with Intel's Broadwell GPUs, and the previous-generation i5-5250U (1.6GHz) has been superseded by an i5-5350U (1.8GHz).

As far as the graphic adapter is concerned, the trustworthy Intel HD graphics 6000 Apple's taste of the months will be. Looking more closely at the benchmark, we were amazed when the new MacBook Air 2017 with i5 features did almost as well as the core iPhone 2017 from two years ago. In the Cinebench single-core test he achieved 116 points (2015 i7: 112 points).

Since Apple offers the 2.2-gigHz Core i7 for another 150 dollars, we assume that the differences in power between the two devices are insignificant at this point. Multicore testing showed the Core i7-5650U to be slightly quicker than our newer i5 (296 vs. 277 points).

Apples latest MacBook 12 with passive cooling Intel Core m3-7Y32 almost did as well in both reviews, was a surprising fact to say the least. This is simulated by performing the Cinebench multicore test in a cycle for at least 30 minutes, and our verdict for MacBook Air 2017 is that even after 20 repetitions, the results remain at their high baseline high.

In PCMark 8, too, the newer 2017 equipped with i5 was very similar in terms of power to the older 2015 MacBook Air equipped with i7. MacBook 12 dropped back, and it's not surprising that the much more costly MacBook Pro scores better in this test. From a subjective point of view, the MacBook Air 13 is a very mobile web device that stands out for its 16:10 side relationship.

For those who need more computing experience, Apple is trying to point out the MacBook Pro 13, which begins at $1299. The Air's Entry-Level 128 GB SSD's reading rates are only slightly lower than those of the MacBook Pro, but the writing capacity is poor in comparision. In the 4k test, however, it did unexpectedly well.

This is a juicy bargain, because a 500 GB Samsung 960 EVO slot is only 220 dollars and exceeds Apple's slotSD. Apple and orange, because as we all know, you can't put m. 2 SSDs in Apple's laptop computers. However, it does serve to underscore Apple's extremely dubious upgrading policies and pricing.

To measure the GPU horsepower of the Air, we chose to run our 3DMark benchmarking on Windows via Bootcamp. The new 2017 Air has developed slightly better than the i7-powered 2015 Air, although it still has exactly the same GPU. MacBook Pro 15 includes a built-in GPU for even more computing capacity.

The operation of some older computer titles has once again proven that Air's graphics processor capabilities have not really significantly increased in recent years. Apple's only reasonably suited laptop for gamers would be the MacBook Pro 15 with its Radeon Pro 555 devoted CPU, which performs about as well as a GTX 950M and is only slightly inferior to the newer MX150 (GT 1030).

Apples and gambling - not a wise move. On the other side Apple and low system noises go very well together. Overall, it stays very low, and if you use the MacBook Air 13 as Apple had planned, it stays very low. However, we've found no differences in sound levels between the MacBook Air's 2015 and present models.

It was not expected that the newer version would react differently from the older one, and we were right. In 2015, we didn't test a notebook's loudspeakers as thoroughly as we do today, and we can make up for that now. Unfortunately, the Air didn't do very well in comparison to the smaller MacBook 12.

So you can be sure you can surf the web more than 10 straight clicks, which MacBook Pro 13 can't do, and even MacBook 12 ran out of power almost 100 clicks before the new MacBook Air. The MacBook Air is the first MacBook to be designed for the MacBook Air.

Some of the most significant changes in laptop designs in recent years, such as higher screen resolution, slimmer bezels and bigger screens in similarly large cases, have not been noticed by the air. Accordingly, it didn't come as a big shock to us that, unlike the MacBook 12 update, Apple chose to update the Air in the background.

Apparently, MacBook Air is no longer considered "presentable" and somehow doesn't match Apple's latest product family. With the new MacBook Air 13, the big problem we have is the screen. We expect a 1000 dollar laptop to provide an IPS screen with at least FHD dissolution in 2017.

It' s $999 for the 128GB standard is quite high, and the additional $200 Apple calculates for a 256GB SSD is, quite openly, the amount of light that is robbed of. Nevertheless, even after all these years, the fundamental air still glows through all this darkness and dirt.

In 2017, too, all these factors are praiseworthy.

Auch interessant

Mehr zum Thema