co.za is South Africa's leading online real estate portal.
PP Britischer Epochenmarker in San Martin, In the nineteenth centuries, the economically minded and philosophical Karl Marx (1818-1883) provided an authoritative analytical account of the evolution and histories of property formation and its relation to the technological production force of a particular time. Marx's concept of private property has proved powerful for many successive economics theory and for anarchistic, Communist and Sozialist policy motions, and has resulted in a far-reaching link between private property and capitals.
Marxist social and political policy distinguishes between "private property" and "private property". In the former, the means of capital formation are the means of capital formation in relation to the private property in a business entity founded on socialised capital formation and contract labour, while the latter is the means of capital formation in relation to goods manufactured by a person.
Private property before the eighteenth centuries generally related to real estate. Global economy and its economic systems. Real estate is divided into three main types - private, communal and communal (cooperative) owners. Personal property cannot survive without a system of politics that determines its own existance, its use and the terms of its use.
This means that private property is definite and exist only for political reasons. I' m thinkin' about property: Since ancient times, the defense of private property has been an integral part of philosophy, theology and law. I' ll start with Plato's thoughts on property in the Republic [...]. The Meaning and Definitions of "Property" in 17th Century England, 1980".
The Importance and Definitions of "Property" in 17th Century England, by G. E. Aylmer, 1980. As Oliver Letwin, a UK conservationist theoretician, stated, the private enterprise must be made up. The pre-Renaissance ideas of property were based on the assumption that different players had different relationships to the same property. The discounts [on the site] [...] have established many of the fundamental concepts for the policy discussion on private property, in particular ownership of real estate.
property rights in the story of business thinking: Proprietary rights: Deriving off theoretical morality from nature has laid the groundwork for the use of economics to back particular ideas in ideology. One of the major strengths of the legitimizing function of economics is that it allows a sentence of philosophical positions to behave as if their inferences were impartial scholarly inferences, while opponents merely expressed their valuable views.
This trend, at its peak, justifies laissez-faire economics as if it were founded on the law of nature. Behind the legitimation activity of the economist is always the faith that what makes or breaks a product are " normal " entities, and that what makes or breaks a product are normal results, and that what makes or breaks a product or service are normal ones.
"Ownership 101: The Founding of a Capitalist System Explained." Institute of Monetary and Capitalist Studies. COPYRIGHT AND CAPITALISM" (PDF). "Self-deserved private property, which is, so to speak, founded on the fusion of the insulated, autonomous worker-individual with the terms of his work, is replaced by capitalist private property, which is founded on the utilization of the nominal free work of others, i.e. contract work.
Once this transformational processes have sufficiently dismantled the old top-down societies, once the workers become workers, their means of work become money, once the way of working in capitalism becomes self-reliant, the further socialization of work and the further conversion of the country and other means of productive activity into collectively owned and thus collectively utilized means of productive activity, as well as the further dispossession of private owners, take on a new shape.
Although the Marx term Marx and the Marx term "socialists" do not agree on the concept of how to understand the concept of classes, on the dynamism of classes and indeed on a whole range of other things, most modernists seem to largely understand his view of what is not right with the free business system of the economy and thus with the social system of capitalism....
Marx's criticism essentially traces two systematic ills back to the capitalist economy: estrangement and plunder. Investment incomes are, by definition, generated by the ownership of property.... Inasmuch as this incomes does not represent an equal yield for a production occupation, it represents an eligibility for a part of the total production of the production occupation of others.
This is probably due to a welfare system to which the employees have never given their full agreement, i.e. that of private property. As an alternative, this is due to a pattern of government to which the labour force is subject: property incomes are the result of plunder.
That it is vital to the capitalist system makes it a classification system similar to other historic cases such as slavery as well as feudalism. However, it is not a system that is not only a system of classes. This free endowment of Mother Nature is personally appropriated by a small minority in modern capitalist societies, which constitutes the moral indignity of imperialism and the expediency of communist transformations... The use of tools of Kapital and the use of physical means in economical productions does not require any individual effort or harshness.
Economical service provided by these productive elements is not physically intrinsic to man. On the contrary, labour service provision, which can only be provided through people' s corporeal and intellectual activity...the truly excessive levels of individual earnings in societies are characterised by property earnings, and this imbalance would be eliminated by equalising revenue distribution...".